September
1998
Actually
Doing Something
Book Review by Martin Rowe
|
|
|
Ethics into Action: Henry Spira
and the Animal Rights Movement by Peter Singer (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield,
1998). $22.95 hardcover. 192 pages
Regular readers of Satya will know that when
it comes to the contemporary animal advocacy movement there are few
thinkers more important than Peter Singer and few activists who have
achieved more than Henry Spira. Now the author of Animal Liberation
has written the biography of the man who, inspired by Singer's original
essay on animal liberation in a 1973 issue of The New York Review
of Books, set out to put Singer's ethics into action.
Such an interaction
between theoretician and practitioner could have turned into a nauseating
love-fest. Luckily, however, Ethics into Action: Henry Spira and
the Animal Rights Movement is saved from self-congratulation by
the very reason these two men have achieved so much: Singer's clarity,
wit, and thorough scholarship and Spira's doggedness and honesty. Independence
has always been a Spira hallmark ever since, born in Belgium in 1927
to Jewish immigrant parents, he moved to Panama and then to the United
States, and left home at the tender age of 17 to forge a life for himself.
Singer's narrative
consciously reveals some of the strands that have made Spira. First,
Spira has been uncompromising in his support of the rights of the oppressed-whether
they were his fellow seaman in the merchant marine, where he served
for 11 years, or the cats whose sexuality was being "tested" in New
York's Museum of Natural History. Secondly, Spira has never worried
about causing trouble by thinking differently. He was discharged from
the army after two years for "subversive and disloyal activities." Throughout
the 1950s and 1960s, Spira wrote for The Militant-covering the
Montgomery bus boycott, the Freedom Summer of 1963, and attacking J.
Edgar Hoover's FBI so much so that a file was opened on him and he was
visited by agents (whom, characteristically, he summarily dismissed).
At each stage of his account, Singer notes the skills Spira learned:
to think outside of established norms and institutions; that careful
research "can often turn up internal contradictions in what a large
organization says and does"; and that dialogue can solve more problems
than confrontation, but that you should be ready with a plan to up the
ante should dialogue fail.
Two-thirds of Ethics
into Action is taken up with Spira's work for animals. It includes
a detailed summary of the tactics that led to Spira spearheading the
campaign to stop experiments on cats at the Museum of Natural History
(1976), changing the position of Amnesty International which had endorsed
a Danish research institute which was burning pigs with hot metal rods
to study the effects of torture on humans (1977), stopping cosmetics
giant Revlon blinding rabbits to test make-up (1980), and other campaigns.
Singer fairly acknowledges that not all these campaigns have been wholly
successful, but points out that several successful campaigns undertaken
by others that have followed owe much to the groundbreaking work Spira
did a decade or so earlier.
Since the early
1990s, Spira has focussed on farm animal issues, recognizing that this
is where 90 percent of animal suffering lies. In one notable success,
his non-profit organization Animal Rights International stopped the
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) from face-branding imported
Mexican cattle in 1994 after an advertisement campaign led over a thousand
readers to protest to the USDA in two days.
None of this has
been without cost, however. Spira's willingness to accept less than
abolition and to recognize the (sometimes slight) concessions of animal
abusers has increasingly left him isolated from more radical animal
rights organizations. His refusal to name-call and his old-fashioned
belief in dialogue and incremental progress often seem out of place
in today's atmosphere of flash and finger-pointing. Given the substantial
amount of money and people-power the animal advocacy movement could
call upon should it get its act together, it is salutary to note, as
Singer unsparingly does, that during the period when he was making inroads
against animal exploitation, Spira worked as a teacher in a New York
City public school, drew a paltry salary, organized and coordinated
campaigns on his own from his very modest apartment, and looked after
his mentally-ill mother when both his father and sister committed suicide.
In 1995, Spira
was diagnosed with stomach cancer and given months to live. Typically,
he did not do what he was meant to do, and three years later he is still
thinking about and carrying out campaigns. While some would question
the imitability of his life-governed as it has been by an independence
bordering on isolation, an intimidating self-reliance, and an awesome
commitment to work over entertainment, justice over self-comfort-lesser
mortals can still learn a vast amount from this entertaining and thoughtful
book about what one person with few resources can do to bring about
change. If we shudder at the sacrifices Spira has made, we should at
least take him at his word: that he is content with how he has lived,
aware that not only has he given life his best shot but he has had fun
doing it.
Peter Singer on Henry Spira and Ethics
into Action
Why did you feel it was important to write
this book?
For two reasons. Firstly, Henry's methods of bringing
about change have been amazingly effective. Without any big organization
behind him, he has been able to change the behavior of huge corporations
like Revlon, and of government departments like the United States Department
of Agriculture. His methods are not limited to the animal movement;
they could also be used by environmentalists, or others working for
good causes. So I think it is really important that they be widely known.
Secondly, I think Henry has found an answer to the problem of how we
can make our lives meaningful. He hasn't got the usual material goods
that people so commonly associate with a successful life, but he has
led a life that is deeply fulfilling. I hope that his life will prove
an inspiration to others who are searching for a way to find fulfillment
in their lives.
What does Henry's life tell us about the challenges
of any activism, especially activism for animals?
It shows that while it is difficult to bring about
change, it is not impossible. You need to think hard about where to
place your lever. Bringing about change is very different from letting
off steam. If that is all you want to do, fine, just go ahead; and then
you can be as morally pure as you like. For example, if you demand total
abolition of all animal experimentation, and refuse to accept anything
less, you almost certainly will not help a single animal. If on the
other hand you want to really make a difference to animals, then you
need to think first, and ask yourself: Just what can I do that will
lead people to change the way animals are treated? Then it isn't a matter
of all or nothing, but often, a matter of bringing about change bit
by bit.
How do you see the future of activism in general,
and animal activism in particular?
I think that we have to become smarter at putting
pressure where it makes a difference. And I see us focusing more and
more on the issues where there are the largest number of animals, and
the greatest amount of suffering. That means farm animals, especially
intensive confinement animal production.