May
1997
Litany
for the Animals
Interview with Mihoko Suzuki and Timothy
Cramer |
|
|
While punk and rock music
have for a decade been raising awareness about cruelty towards
animals, contemporary
classical music has not dealt with the issue. Until now. In her work
Litany for the Animals, which premiered in New York City in June
1996 and was repeated in a shortened form in December, Japanese native
Mihoko Suzuki explores vivisection, factory farming, and vegetarianism
in graphic and startling detail through the eyes of three "plantagians," a "carnivorous
woman," two "nuns" and selected children's and adult voices. Satya
talked to her about Litany and her latest project, This World, with
words by Timothy Cramer. This World will be performed at 8pm on May
20th and 27th at Washington Square Church on West Fourth Street.
Tickets cost $10 ($7 for students). For more details contact: 718-625-5665.
Q: What was the inspiration
for Litany? Why was it important for you to write this piece?
Mihoko Suzuki: The idea of music-theater
about animals came to me very naturally. Generally, I'm not comfortable
with insisting on my own philosophical or political statement
for art's sake. But when it comes to animals, I feel very sure
about what I want to express to the public.
Although I was always aware of the suffering of animals, there was a
period where I refused to acknowledge it and wanted to ignore the truth.
I knew I had to become a living being free of animal products sooner
or later. So, Litany, in a way, had the essence of a self-portrait at
that turning point, questioning why I couldn't give up eating them.
Q: When did you begin Litany?
MS: It was three years ago that I
started looking for a story about animals. For operas and oratorios,
it's normally easier to compose music along with a story line.
But I couldn't find any stories that I liked, so I began asking
why I couldn't create a sort of missionary piece that advocates
animal rights and vegetarianism. Finally, I constructed the entire
scheme and libretto based on quotations I collected from various
books, magazines and the Bible.
Q: Litany has many different
types of vocal expressions. Why did you choose this format?
MS: I thought that the parts that
describe the most cruelty should be spoken by children because
of the naive and innocent sounds of their voices. Just to hear
them struggling to say those tongue-twisting terms of vivisection
seemed so surreal to me, especially when they had no idea what
the words meant.
I employed only women's voices because I like voices in a higher register.
Men's voices seemed too dark and heavy for this piece. I mean, the subject
is already very depressing and very serious. Of course, a question arises
as to whether or not my interpretation of the text should necessarily
be over-emphasized by music. In my case, I'm rather interested in experimenting
with the gap between what a word means and how it actually sounds, and
finding out how the effect will be perceived by the audience.
There was also a video shown at the conclusion of the performance. It
was a collage of scenes from all over the city with ordinary people reciting
sentences from a poem. The scenes were juxtaposed with the images of
the Carnivorous Woman, who has confined herself in a cage, and children's
voices murmuring in the background. I asked people to say their sentences
in a fairly dry, unemotional and even humorous way. It was a radical
poem by writer and journalist Lisa Couturier, called "Litany for the
Animals." Some people actually thought the poem was a joke. The
video looks so ironic because of the gap between what we see and what
we hear.
Q: Litany is scored for a clarinet,
bassoon, and viol. Why did you choose those instruments?
MS: Part of the reason was that I
needed middle to lower register instruments to support the women's
high voices. I like the pale and vibrato-less tone of the clarinet
and bassoon. The clarinet especially has a broad range of dynamic
expression and technical resources. I also like the "boxiness" and
modesty of the viol. The timbre is dark and mellow, but neither
as persistent nor overwhelmingly passionate as the orchestral
strings. They are my three favorite instruments and, anyway,
they were all I could afford!
Q: Why did you choose characters
called "plantagians," a "carnivorous" woman, and two "nuns?"
MS: I made up the word "plantagian," which
means plant-eater. I could have named them vegetarians, but that
was too common, too obvious, and too limited. The nuns represent
the authority of the church and Christianity which, in general,
has a conflict with the concept of vegetarianism and animal rights.
The Carnivorous Woman is a model of this Man-dominated society.
On the one hand, she enslaves animals, and on the other she is
also a slave to the institution. She desperately tries to defend
and justify herself by referring to biblical clichés and
the anachronistic Christian view. And she fails. We all know
that it's very hard for someone to preach convincingly about
peace and love who also supports animal abuse. This piece is
about emancipation of ourselves, our prejudices and our customs
-- which eventually leads to animal liberation.
Q: What has been the response
to Litany?
MS: A few people slammed the door
and walked out when it was performed in June. Other than that
I was quite surprised that people, in fact, stayed to the end
and accepted it. I was expecting more dramatic situations, with
an angry audience catcalling and throwing their chairs at the
stage. Instead, I had responses like: "I loved the music, I loved
the staging, I'm not sure about the subject."
Timothy Cramer: They thought the message was too
strong, and battered them over the head too much. A lot of people
just sat back, closed their eyes, and listened to the music. And
it didn't matter so much what they were looking at.
Q: How do you feel that people
can somehow split the music off from the subject?
MS: Frankly, I've been very flattered
that people like my music. Besides, I suspected they wouldn't
appreciate the subject. I mean, who would possibly enjoy watching
a show that makes the audience feel that they are evil? If I
was a meat-eater, I'd feel very uncomfortable. I may have thrown
some chairs at the stage! Overall, Litany was a tremendous learning
experience for me, working with different forms of art, such
as image, movement, objects, light, and ambiance, combined together
to express this highly controversial issue.
Q: How would you describe your
next piece, This World?
MS: It's much more abstract and "friendly," perhaps,
than Litany.
TC: The poems I wrote were basically written in
response to the comments that were given to Litany by some people,
as well as an exercise in creating styles for myself as a writer.
Like Mihoko, I was trying to write without a direct message myself
because I'm hoping that through poetry and the words the listener
will formulate their own message. I've written a series of words
that are repetitive in nature. Very slowly over time they evolve
not so much into a message as a question.
Q: How did this piece come about?
MS: I read an article that Tim wrote
in a magazine called "Sandbox."
TC: It was about "chance art" in music and art
from the Dadaists to John Cage in the 1950s.
MS: It was the style of the writing
that inspired me. So, I asked him to write poems about animals.
When the piece came out, I was fascinated by the way it sounded,
and the way the rhythm of the phrases flew, as if it had its
own music already.
Q: How have you scored this piece?
MS: For one tenor and two sopranos,
that's all. I have featured a European folk music flavor for
this piece. Because there is no instrumental support, there's
neither an excessive use of modulation nor an extremely complicated
harmonic structure, but rather the aesthetic of simplicity and
purity. I've focused on pursuing the potential beauty of human
voices. There will also be an actor, most likely myself, sharing
the stage with the singers. What am I going to do? Well, that'll
be a surprise....
|
© STEALTH TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
|