March
1999
Editorial:
The Very Best
By Martin Rowe
|
|
|
I will be the first to admit that Im not much
of a gourmet. Not only did I once dine on pigs liver and potatoes
followed by toast and yeast extract but I once reviewed a restaurant
for Vegetarian Times where virtually all the food was either good
or interestingfor which descriptive and insightful
analysis the magazine quite rightly canned the review.
So, its not as if Im a foodie on a rampagebut Ive
come to the perhaps unremarkable conclusion that vegetarians deserve more
from vegetarian or mainly vegetarian restaurants than were currently
getting. Too often weve felt grateful to walk into a place where
you can eat more than salad and steamed greens and the waiter knows that
fish(es) or chickens arent vegetables. Too often weve been
delighted not to have to ask whats in that strange green sauce that
has been drizzledif thats the wordover our food without
our asking. Too often weve been relieved not to sit down in a restaurant
where the clientele is so aggressively chic or just plain aggressive that
they look as though they would eat you if they could. Unfortunately, this
live-and-let-live approach to dining bred, in me at least, a kind of total
tolerance for veggie-oriented restaurants that may not have been a good
thing. As a friend once told me, too often vegetarian food suffers from
the three Bs: boring, bland, and brown. We deserve the best,
he continued. I use to think Id settle for moderately tolerable,
but Ive had a change of heart andgosh darn itmy friend
is right. We do deserve the best!
I should say that most of the veggie restaurants I have been in over
the last few years have delicious food with outstanding service in a
delightful
atmosphere. There are places which are cheap, cheerful and functional;
warm, cozy, and mellow; and clean, crisp, and conversational. These shall
remain nameless because I dont want to name those places that areto
put it mildlycrap. Im getting tired of walking into a joint
where the tables have no place settings or lights, the other tables havent
been cleared, and the room is so dim that you can barely make out which
way youre holding the menu. The menu itself is scrawled and misspelled;
the food is brought to you (if it is brought to you) by a waiter whos
out when he should be in for lunch; and when the food comes it lacks elementary
vigor and spice. Call me fussy, but I like a clean bathroom with no paper
strewn on the floor, a restaurant where they actually have in stock the
substances they advertise on the menu, and where you dont have to
beg for a glass of water. I like a restaurant that is open when it says
it is, and where your entrée doesnt all fit on top of (or
under) a lettuce leaf.
Now I dont want vegetarians to turn into luvviesLoud Urban
Vegetarianswho will only eat tofu if it has been marinated in pomegranate
and passion fruit juice for 264 and a half days and certified by a member
of the Animal Liberation Front. I dont want to sound off like someone
who expects their restaurants to be as hygienic as Howard Hughess
loofah. But I think its about time we vegetarians stopped being
downtrodden sad sacks who will settle for a half-cooked potato and watered-down
carrot juiceif its not too much trouble. These are radical
ideas, I know. But I believe that restaurateurs should learn how to run
a restaurant before opening one. I believe they should pay their staff
well so the latter dont deliver your food to the table looking as
though youd just kicked them in the shins. I believe there should
be managersones who acknowledge that youve walked in and are
welcome. If you want to be abused, why go to a restaurant? The subway
is cheaperand at least you get somewhere.
So heres to great vegetarian diningthe sort that celebrates
the food we choose to eat as a healthy, life-affirming pleasure. Heaven
knows, our plates are full enough in life without enjoying full plates.
And remember, O restaurateurs, before irate vegetarians run amok with
large root vegetables and garlic bulbswe deserve the best! Bon
appetit!