December
1997
Worlds
Collide Along the Wild Coast
By Daria Caliguire
|
|
|
South Africa is perhaps best known
on the African continent as a land of extremes: unique for its sophisticated
and dehumanizing system of racial oppression under apartheid as well
as its near-miraculous and peaceful transition to democracy. In terms
of development, South Africa's tendency toward extremes persists. There
exists a striking and uneasy juxtaposition of first and third world
conditions both within cities as gated suburbs neighbor squatter camps
and on a much greater scale between South Africa's urban and rural areas.
Part of the great challenge undertaken by the new government is to bridge
these disparities in development through integrating and providing resources
to previously disadvantaged communities and areas. The government's
current attempt to tackle such a challenge in the Eastern Cape, one
of the poorest provinces in the country, shows the difficult obstacles
and choices inherent in such a development initiative.
Lushlands and Poverty
The Eastern Cape is legendary for both its natural
and community resources. It has fertile farmlands, lush vegetation and
the single largest stretch of undeveloped and spectacular coastline
in South Africa, known as the Wild Coast. As the birthplace and training
ground for many of the country's most famous anti-apartheid leaders,
including Nelson Mandela and Stephen Biko, it also claims a proud heritage
of political activism which is partially rooted in the traditional home
it provides for the Xhosa people.
The Eastern Cape has other, less laudable features:
high infant mortality, limited access to clean water and a migrant labor
mining system which has left in its wake an extremely high concentration
of poor, female headed households. These problematic conditions and
other related indicators of the region's underdevelopment are notably
worse in the rural parts of the province, which fall largely within
the boundaries of the former black homelands, Ciskei and Transkei, than
in the predominantly white urban centers, which form an industrial corridor.
Creating a Fault Line
In an attempt to bridge the gap between the Eastern
Cape's rural and urban areas, in 1996 the national government targeted
the Wild Coast and the industrial corridor for development under a special
program, the Spatial Development Initiative (SDI). This planning-led
program is meant to evaluate the particular needs of each targeted area,
examine their linkages to the rest of the province and design an overall
development strategy. To date, the needs-assessment for each area has
been completed, but progress on the next stage of the Wild Coast SDI
is stalled. Although there are a number of factors that have slowed
the SDI development process, the Wild Coast as a case study provides
insight into one critical set of issues that creates an urban-rural'
fault line a divide between Western and developed, versus traditional
and underdeveloped which becomes difficult to traverse.
The fault line lies in the land itself and has
taken shape around the issues of ownership, community control and benefit,
environmental impact and conflicting notions of development. The Wild
Coast and much of the Transkei is dotted with small Xhosa villages connected
by dirt roads and cattle paths that wash away when the rains come and
even in the driest weather are difficult to travel. The absence of a
comprehensive and paved highway system has left the Transkei isolated
to both its benefit and detriment. The region's isolation has meant
that the traditional community fabric remains strong and many of the
villages are able to provide for themselves through local subsistence
agriculture and harvesting from the sea. However, the Transkei's isolation
has also meant that as South Africa's first world continues to prosper
and expand, the gap widens. This not only leaves the Transkei further
behind but puts additional pressure on the province to develop a natural
resource base for large scale economic developments.
Land Ownership, Land Grab
As a first step toward opening up the Transkei
for development and greater integration into the rest of the province,
the SDI recommends building a highway along the Wild Coast to link the
Transkei to the industrial corridor in the south and the developed Natal
coastline in the north. The SDI plan argues that the highway is essential
to: connect Transkei communities with each other and the rest of the
country, develop their natural resource base with bigger markets for
distribution, as well as opening the area up for eco-tourism.
There is one major problem: land ownership. Almost
all of the land along the Wild Coast and in rural Transkei is communally
owned. All decisions regarding land use and allocation are traditionally
handled at the local level through community process, with the chief
usually having the final say. The lack of private property rights has
complicated standard procedures for expropriation by or sale to the
government of land, and has temporarily put the SDI plans on hold. Unfortunately,
however, it has not had the same effect on private sales. Instead, it
has provided an opening for unscrupulous private developers and investors.
Once the 1994 democratic elections formally erased
the hostile borders between the former Transkei homeland and its South
African neighbors, developers started moving into the area and made
deals with local chiefs to acquire prime ocean-front property on the
Wild Coast for high-end resort development. Given that most of the communities
have no mechanism for dealing with the sale of communal land to outsiders,
most of the acquisitions were made for well below (any possible assessment
of) market value and on terms that at best would benefit only the chief.
Not only would the majority of the community fail to share in the benefits
of the development, but it would suffer from a loss of access to the
land an important means of subsistence.
The potential for abuse and virtually unlimited
negative social and environmental impacts was so great that it rapidly
caught public attention. A coalition of environmental non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) successfully petitioned the court to halt the sale
of all land along the Wild Coast. A commission was set up to investigate
the abuses and recommend a set of procedures for handling the sale or
transfer of communal land to both government and private parties. The
commission's findings are due in 1998. Its release promises to re-ignite
the debate surrounding the future of the Wild Coast and what development
means when first and third worlds collide.
Daria Caliguire recently returned from three
years in South Africa, where she was involved in a number of programs
concerned with sustainable policies over land use and indigenous rights.