Search www.satyamag.com

Satya has ceased publication. This website is maintained for informational purposes only.

To learn more about the upcoming Special Edition of Satya and Call for Submissions, click here.

back issues

 

August 2004
Right-Bashing or Left-Washing?
By Catherine Clyne

 

“Working Assets—cool!” I often get such enthusiasm when I use my bright purple credit card to make a purchase. People know that a portion of every transaction goes to help nonprofit organizations working to make a positive difference in the world, fighting for human rights and the environment, among other things. In fact, Working Assets’ “members” gave nearly $5 million to various causes last year. Along with its credit card, Working Assets offers long distance phone service as well, which I also use.

An example of some of the cool stuff Working Assets does: a few weeks ago I received a pamphlet in the mail entitled “The right-wing rip-off.” It’s a promotion to get your friends to sign up for their long distance service so that together we can “fight right-wing extremism” to create a “better world.”

“They call themselves conservatives,” it warns, “but in truth they are extremists, the right-wing fringe. And from tax cuts to prescription-drug coverage to the increasingly tragic hundred-billion-dollar hunt for weapons of mass destruction, they’ve been ripping us off for years.”

“Help fight back by helping recruit more members to Working Assets,” they say, “where one percent of your bill goes to progressive nonprofits working for peace, justice, and the environment.” And the hard sell: “More Working Assets members means more donations means more leverage for our side. Plus, as a signing bonus, you and your friend get to call each other free for a year.”

Cool…right?

Not So Cool
A few months ago I read a little piece in Mother Jones entitled, “What’s in Your Wallet?” (May/June 2004), listing the top 10 credit card companies that give to the GOP. MBNA is the number one corporate donor to the Republican Party; Working Assets credit cards are issued by MBNA.

Dave Gilson and Jennifer Hahn report that MBNA’s founder and former chairman Charles Cawley raised $370,000 for the Bush/Cheney 2000 election campaign, including nearly a quarter of a million from MBNA’s employees. Cawley also personally donated $5,000 to the GOP’s Florida recount team and $100,000 to Bush’s inauguration. He was a top fundraiser for the 2000 Bush/Cheney ticket, and is still going strong.

This is not a new development. MBNA has generously supported the Republican Party for the past decade. In the last quarter of 2003, MBNA was one of the top three contributors to the GOP. Now retired, Cawley has pledged to raise oodles of cash to help Bush get reelected.

So much for using your money to fight right-wing extremism.

Just How Bad?
While there’s a certain level of dirt with just about every credit card and MBNA isn’t alone in its generous giving to politics, the difference is one of enormous degree. Let’s compare it with Citigroup, for example, which is regularly targeted by activists for supporting oil ventures that abuse human rights and the environment and is MBNA’s primary rival as the top credit card issuer in the country.

According to the Mother Jones report, over the past three election cycles (2000, 2002 and 2004), Citigroup donated roughly $4.5 million to the GOP and $4.3 million to the Democrats; that’s about four percent more to the Republicans. MBNA gave $5.2 million to the GOP and $1.2 million to the Dems—a whopping 350 percent more to the right.

The way Delaware-based MBNA is currently growing, the horizon looks quite rosy: with two million new accounts opened during the first quarter of 2004, MBNA reported a 20 percent rise in profits; with an addition of 2.5 million new credit card holders for the second quarter, MBNA enjoyed a 21 percent profit jump. They are currently positioning themselves to aggressively enter the credit card market in China. The sky’s the limit.

Household Economics: More Than a Pound of Flesh
Why are financial service companies dumping millions into political campaigns, you might ask. It has a little something to do with the amount of debt we Americans owe.

According to 2003 Federal Reserve statistics, the average American household carries some $8,000 in credit card debt, collectively owing bank and retail credit card companies a staggering $700 billion. Given that 43 percent of American families spend more cash than they earn in a year, it’s no surprise that personal bankruptcies have doubled in the past decade. And that’s partly what this is about.

With credit card users owing MBNA roughly $82 billion, there’s a lot at stake. And to stay on top of things, MBNA has its own Political Action Committee.

Corporations that profit from the credit industry have contributed grandly to pressure politicians to pass a bill making it tougher for people to file for bankruptcy. MBNA was also a leading proponent of banking deregulation and lobbied against the protection of consumer privacy in a recently passed bill. (For example, if card holders want to protect their privacy, they have to specifically request institutions not distribute their personal information; whereas the democrats unsuccessfully tried to include an “opt in” clause that would have given consumers the option of allowing their information to be distributed.)

There’s a reason why major religions ban usury, the practice of lending money with exorbitant interest (although most have worked a way around it these days). Debt is one of the oldest manifestations of power in human history, a dynamic that’s very difficult to upset once established.

Offsetting Evil
In a letter, I voiced my concerns to Working Assets, asking if they had an explanation for choosing the top Republican Party supporter for its credit card transactions. “I don’t understand how Working Assets can seriously ‘work for change’ by lining the pockets of MBNA with well-meaning, progressive dollars,” I wrote.

After thanking me for giving Working Assets the “opportunity” to respond to my concerns over their partnership with MBNA, Customer Relations Representative Dale explained: “All of us at Working Assets are doing our best to make social change happen while remaining a viable business. We believe that the tens of millions of dollars channeled to progressive nonprofits through our credit card and long distance programs more than offset the inevitable compromises required to operate our business.”

If institutions that can handle large credit card portfolios were difficult to come by, I might be sympathetic. But that’s hardly the case here. For me, it’s a matter of scale: of the top contributors to the Bush/Cheney 2000 election campaign, MBNA gave more than Phillip Morris or the NRA, and contributed only $20,000 less than that good corporate citizen Enron. Oh, and move over Enron—according to the Center for Public Integrity, this past January MBNA unseated Enron as the top career supporter of George W. Bush.

To be sure, there’s a distinction to be made: while MBNA profits from Working Assets’ credit card portfolio, its long distance service is leased from major carriers. So MBNA isn’t profiting from Working Assets long distance users.

Since everybody knows that without money Bush couldn’t buy the White House again, it seems a tad disingenuous for Working Assets to say the good they do “offsets” the business they bring to MBNA. Their partnership with the second largest credit card company in the country, which happens to be one of the biggest GOP supporters, makes their “right-wing rip-off” pamphlet seem somehow obscene, like an absurd lefty marketing ploy. Sure, it’s insulting, but, more damaging, there are a lot of people who think they’re helping important causes by using Working Assets and other such credit cards.

MBNA’s corporate motto is “Getting the right customers and keeping them.” With Working Assets and many other activist groups, they’ve certainly managed to get the right customers. If Bush-bashing is going to be profitable, MBNA higher-ups obviously feel comfortable enough to happily support groups that do just that. Making me feel like a real sucker.

Now for the Bad News
Before you cut up your Working Assets credit card in a huff, be advised that they are simply one of thousands of groups that issue their credit cards via MBNA.

A few weeks after reading the Mother Jones piece, a friend offered to pay a bar tab with her HSUS credit card. I fairly hissed when I saw the MBNA logo, which made me dig a little deeper.

With an enormous roster of more than 5,100 endorsement programs, including hundreds of universities and alumni associations, MBNA issues credit cards for groups ranging from the NAACP to NASDAQ; the American Medical Student Association to the Marine Corps; the National Hockey League to the Smithsonian Institution; the National Black Women’s Health Project to NASCAR. Not to say it stops there. Here’s a taste of some of the animal, environmental, human rights, and veggie groups MBNA issues cards for: the Humane Society, the Animal Protection Institute, In Defense of Animals, Amnesty International, the Sierra Club, the Nature Conservancy, and the Vegetarian Resource Group.

“Guess I’ll use a different card ‘til after the election,” my friend chuckled.

Watch these pages next month for suggested credit card alternatives. To learn more about corporate political contributions, visit the Center for Responsive Politics at www.opensecrets.org. An excellent resource for up-to-date goings-on at MBNA is the Delaware News Journal online at www.delawareonline.com/newsjournal.

 



© STEALTH TECHNOLOGIES INC.
All contents are copyrighted. Click here to learn about reprinting text or images that appear on this site.