Search www.satyamag.com

Satya has ceased publication. This website is maintained for informational purposes only.

To learn more about the upcoming Special Edition of Satya and Call for Submissions, click here.

back issues

 

April 2001
PCBs in the Hudson: GE Says “No Cleanup Necessary”

By David Higby

 

The orcas of coastal British Columbia once had it made. With no natural enemies, these 30-foot sea mammals, also known as killer whales, once sat serenely atop the food web, masters of their own destiny by virtue of their size and strength. Orcas, however, can claim the dubious title of the world’s most contaminated animal, and population data suggest these majestic giants will soon be saddled with the ignominy of a place on the endangered species list. The most troubling of the chemical pollutants that riddle the orca’s sometimes 12,000 pound frame are polychlorinated biphenyls—PCBs. Male orcas are commonly found to have PCB concentrations in excess of 250 parts per million, 5,000 times the level deemed safe by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Human residents of New York, especially those who live along the Hudson river, have a special reason to be concerned about this disturbing news, and to hang their heads, since many of the PCBs found in today’s Pacific northwest sea creatures likely came from the Empire State.

The federal government has designated 14 waterways, from the Rio Grande in Texas to the Connecticut and parts of the Mississippi Rivers, as American Heritage Rivers—streams that are deemed to have particular economic, cultural and environmental significance for all Americans. Of this group, the Hudson River is unique in that most of it—a 200 mile stretch from Hudson Falls to the Battery in Manhattan—is simultaneously the country’s largest Superfund site. Between 1946 and 1977, when they were declared illegal, over a million pounds of waste PCBs were discharged from two General Electric plants in the upper Hudson, a fact that essentially made the river over into the world’s largest PCB dumping ground. PCBs are a class of manmade chemicals once valued for their stability; they are stubbornly nonflammable and do not easily break down. When released into the environment, these same qualities make them among the world’s most persistent pollutants. They are also extremely potent. PCBs mimic natural hormones, such as estrogen, and can severely disrupt the body’s endocrine system, resulting in birth defects, sterility and degradation of the immune system in humans and wildlife. Unlike more water-soluble pollutants, PCBs are hydrophobic, meaning that rather than washing downstream, much of their volume prefers to attach itself to carbon compounds. The Hudson river bottom is carbon-rich, particularly in the north where sediment backed up by dams still has a large proportion of decayed wood from the river’s days as a vehicle for lumber and pulp. So the upper Hudson makes a perfect medium for storing PCBs: Even 20 years after their ban, hundreds of thousands of pounds remain imbedded in the river bottom waiting for the inevitable flood seasons to turn the water column into an agent for global toxic distribution.

Entering the environment through bottom-dwelling organisms, PCBs work their way up the global food web in increasingly lethal concentrations. The most common and efficient pathway is through fish, at greatest risk are fish-eating birds and mammals, such as the belted kingfisher, great blue heron, mink and river otter. Studies have shown that PCBs adversely affect the behavior, survival and reproduction of these animals, as well as other species, such as raptors and large marine mammals which are particularly vulnerable to the hormonal effects of PCBs. While otters and mink, whose diets are almost exclusively fish, are most threatened, even owls and eagles have been found on the River with PCB concentrations that would qualify their carcasses as hazardous waste (containing an excess of 50 parts per million).

The struggle to address this global environmental tragedy, and potential public health crisis, has, to a large extent, paralleled the history of the environmental movement, in that it is the story of laws catching up to the reality of pollution. While their toxicity was known as far back as the 1930s, by the 70s the threat to human health posed by PCBs became evident to the point that it could no longer be ignored. In 1975, concern over PCB contamination resulted in fishing being banned on the Hudson; today fish advisories remain on the river, including one that warns against consumption of Hudson River fish by children and women of child-bearing age.

Unclean Politics
In the late 1970s, primarily because of the damage to Hudson fisheries, New York State tried to address the issue of PCB contamination. But the politics of the business relocation wars reared its head. No one disputed that GE was the polluter in this case, but by threatening to move tens of thousands of jobs from New York—its headquarters then were in nearby Schenectady—the company had substantial leverage with politicians, and therefore, in the settlement negotiations. The bargain was brokered by Jack Welch himself, who would later become the corporation’s celebrated CEO. It was a sweetheart deal for GE, which wound up paying only a few million dollars for partially capping some local landfills where PCBs had been dumped. Though a meager plan was developed for cleaning parts of the river, nothing was ever implemented or accomplished.

Eventually, in the face of revelations of toxic sites throughout the nation, the federal government had to take action. In 1980, Congress passed a law designed to provide a process for cleaning up the nation’s most contaminated sites. It was called the Comprehensive Environmental Recovery, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). The law contained several guiding principles. Among them: if the principal responsible party (the PRP) could be identified, that polluter would be liable for paying for the cleanup, regardless of whether any laws had been broken. If no PRP was identified, the money for a cleanup would come from a dedicated money cache which became known as the Superfund. The law also put restrictions on how much delay the PRP could engage in and set forth a process by which the EPA should determine the proper cleanup actions. The last of the nine sections of this process is “community acceptance” intended to give local municipalities a say in the decision-making.

The 200-mile stretch of Hudson River contaminated by PCBs was added to the Superfund register in 1986. It is now the longest unattended site on that list. The reasons for the Hudson cleanup plans languishing are political. The Agency presented a plan in the late 1980s, for instance, but a Reagan Era EPA director (who later resigned in disgrace after it was revealed she and a subordinate had inappropriately close ties with polluters) sent the project back for more study. Recognizing the political pitfalls of the Hudson situation, the EPA spent ten years, from 1990 to 2000, studying the Hudson River PCB situation. Their conclusion was that PCBs in the river’s sediment pose an unacceptable risk to the health of humans and the environment. Their proposed solution is to dredge 2.65 million cubic yards of sediment from the northern part of the river, a move that would cut in half the 500 pounds of PCBs that spill annually over the federal dam in Troy, a barrier that provides the dividing point between the upper Hudson and the rest of the river.

The delaying politics continue, however. Most of the upper river is part of New York’s 22nd Congressional District, a sprawling, rural area gerrymandered to accommodate Gerald Solomon, a conservative Republican who, for years, used his considerable Congressional clout to intimidate the EPA. A few years ago, Solomon resigned in mid-term to become a GE lobbyist, one of many powerful advocates the company has under contract. In an obvious attempt to derail the cleanup plan by skewing the “community acceptance” part of CERCLA, GE has recently engaged in a public relations campaign of unprecedented magnitude (estimates exceed $2 million a week). With techniques like slick sound bites on radio and TV spots and daily full-page newspaper ads, the company has driven home its message: no cleanup required. Most of this massive media blitz is directed at the 100,000 residents of the upriver region, where most of the dredging will take place—billboards saying “Stop the EPA from dredging” line all the major roads in the upriver counties. The other 10 million people who live close to the Superfund site get less and less attention as one moves down the river valley.

How this struggle plays out remains to be seen. Recent developments in the Bush Administration, like the reversal of EPA arsenic standards in drinking water and abandoning a campaign promise to address carbon dioxide emissions, do not bode well for a cleanup of the Hudson River PCBs. New York’s George Pataki, however, who has positioned himself as a green governor, is in favor of a cleanup, although his public pronouncements on the subject have been sparse.

Much more is at stake than just the health of a great river. When CERCLA first went into effect, it was in response to toxic dumps like the infamous Love Canal. Many of those obvious sites have been addressed. Over 1,400 other federal Superfund sites remain, however, awaiting cleanup plans (including scores that are GE’s responsibility—the company is involved in more sites than anyone). Over a third of these sites are under water, and the Hudson River project could well determine whether those contaminated water bodies will be cleaned up any time soon. Among them are PCB projects in the Great Lakes where coho salmon exceed the EPA’s PCB threshold 70 fold, ducks often contain PCB levels 60 times the health standard for domestic poultry, and cormorants suffer from crossbill syndrome, a PCB deformity, at 42 times the natural occurrence. If GE’s public relations and lobbying campaign proves itself an effective strategy for dodging Superfund responsibility, it could become the template for corporate procrastination, and result in a powerful impediment to toxic cleanups nationwide. If the tactic becomes commonplace, orcas, humans, and living things worldwide will pay a heavy price.

David Higby is the Solid Waste Project Director for Environmental Advocates of NYS. He is also a 25-year resident of Washington County, New York, where the Hudson Falls and Fort Edward GE capacitor plants in this article are located. Environmental Advocates represents 130 grass-roots groups and over 7,000 members statewide, and is the New York affiliate of the National Wildlife Federation. For more information visit www.envadvocates.org or their Hudson River site www.cleanhudson.org.

 


© STEALTH TECHNOLOGIES INC.
All contents are copyrighted. Click here to learn about reprinting text or images that appear on this site.